North Halifax Improved Streets for People public engagement report 2023

Summary

The North Halifax Improved Streets for People scheme aims to deliver improvements to walking and cycling provision in north Halifax to benefit residents, businesses and visitors. This scheme is part of a wider programme across West Yorkshire, focused on connecting people in the communities of greatest economic need with job and training opportunities through accessible, attractive and cleaner transport. This will, in turn, help boost productivity, living standards and air quality, helping to create happier healthier communities for the future.

Providing an accessible, attractive and cleaner alternative to car journeys is at the heart of the Leeds City Region Transforming Cities Fund (TCF) – a major new programme of transport infrastructure investment secured as part of the West Yorkshire devolution deal.

The £457 million programme, which is being delivered by the Combined Authority in partnership with local authorities, is being paid for with money from the Department for Transport (DfT) and local match funding.

Making trips on foot, bicycle, or bus, rather than by car, also helps improve health and the environment. When we travel in these ways, we improve air quality by lowering pollution which has benefits for our health and helps tackle climate change.

The scheme has previously been through three rounds of consultation in 2020, 2021 and 2022. In early 2023, the scheme went through a period of public engagement, to update stakeholders on the current scheme plans. This period was not a formal public consultation, the aim was to share the updated proposals based on the feedback received in previous rounds of consultation. This was conducted as a targeted local engagement activity, to ensure the plans were made available to those believed to be directly impacted by this scheme. This report details the engagement activity undertaken by Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council (CMBC) between March and May 2023, which will be used to inform the designs of the North Halifax Improved Streets for People scheme.

Scheme background

In September 2020, Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council (CMBC) conducted a survey with those who lived, worked and travelled through North and West Halifax to understand their barriers to walking and cycling, and the perceptions of traffic and movement in the two areas. This was referred to as Calderdale Streets for People. This was undertaken to inform the early development of schemes that aimed to improve the street environment making it more walking and cycle-friendly. Following this, the scheme was split and taken forward separately as “West Halifax Improved Streets for People” and “North Halifax Improved Streets for People”. The Council team also carried out stakeholder engagement activity with local Councillors, community groups and businesses across the schemes.

CMBC developed concept designs and consulted on these between March and April 2021.

The consultation, which took place during the Outline Business Case (OBC) stage of the project, focused on the details and locations of proposals. The feedback received was considered and used to refine the designs and submitted with the OBC.

The results of the engagement survey and the first stage of consultation indicated strong support for the schemes.

For North Halifax, positive and very positive responses to the proposals ranged from 36.4% to 82.1% with an average across the scheme of 58.5%.
Where key issues were raised by respondents, these were considered and, where appropriate, incorporated as part of the development of the designs prior to submission of the OBC.

A consultation on the designs submitted with the OBC took place between November 2021 and January 2022.

Figure 1: Timeline of scheme progression
2020	2021	2022	2023
Public survey completed in September Proposals developed based on survey feedback	Proposals shared at first public consultation between March and April, and feedback incorporated into proposals Outline Business Case submitted September Second public consultation launched in November	Second public consultation closed January Proposals updated in response to consultation feedback	Presented updated proposals to stakeholders and public between March and May Updated proposals, considering feedback to recent engagement Plan to submit Full Business Case later in 2023

This report focuses on how feedback from the most recent engagement has been considered and, where practicable, used to inform the development of the next stage of detailed designs before progressing to scheme approvals and delivery.

Responding to the 2021/22 consultation

In response to the 2021/22 public consultation, CMBC made changes to the proposals. Many of these changes were in response to feedback received as a result of this consultation, and aimed to address concerns raised at this stage, as well as taking forward opportunities highlighted by feedback around how this scheme can better meet the need of stakeholders. In addition to the feedback from consultation and engagement, design changes were necessary following completion of additional onsite technical surveys, as well as reviewing the designs against national guidance for cycling and walking infrastructure that the scheme needs to follow. Details of the changes made in response to these factors can be found on the North Halifax Improved Streets for People project page.

Summary of you said, we did feedback
Scheme area	You said	We did
Scheme wide	Consider bus stops/bus passengers and cyclists - need enough space for both.	Bus stop accessibility, such as their locations, kerb heights and whether they are accessed via dropped kerbs, has been reviewed across the scheme in consultation with Calderdale and WYCA officers.
Scheme wide	Make sure that islands are wide enough for bus passengers.	Bus stop accessibility, such as their locations, kerb heights and whether they are accessed via dropped kerbs, has been reviewed across the scheme in consultation with Calderdale and WYCA officers.
Scheme wide	Consider bus stops and ramps from buses for wheelchairs.	Bus stop accessibility, such as their locations, kerb heights and whether they are accessed via dropped kerbs, has been reviewed across the scheme in consultation with Calderdale and WYCA officers.
Scheme wide	Pathways will need to be wide enough to accommodate a person with a guide dog and for users of electric wheelchairs with long canes.	Relevant design guidance including Inclusive Mobility has been followed throughout, and we have made some improvements to pedestrian facilities where possible, including widened footways.
Scheme wide	Concern about wheelchair user and partially sighted user safety at dropped kerbs when it is slippery, and the wheelchair user can slide into traffic.	Steep gradients of crossings and dropped kerbs are being addressed through the revised design where possible, however, in some cases it may be difficult to improve due to the natural topography and resultant levels.
Scheme wide	Concerns around the affordability of the on-going maintenance of the scheme.	We have tried to simplify proposals as much as possible to reduce the on-going maintenance burden whilst still achieving the required outcomes.
Scheme wide	Concern about the uptake in cycling in the area.	Concern about safety is one of the key barriers preventing people from cycling. The scheme should help to promote cycling by providing a safe and attractive route.
Cousin Lane to Ovenden Way	Concerns about loss of parking on Cousin Lane, specifically from residents in homes on the west side over loss of a parking bay outside properties from no. 91 up to approx. no 107.	Proposals have been updated to retain additional parking spaces on the west side of Cousin Lane.
Cousin Lane to Ovenden Way	Concern about size of vehicles coming down Club Lane, as wagons cannot access the business park from the bottom.	The proposals for Cousin Lane will accommodate vehicle access to the business park on Club Lane.
Ovenden Way (junction with A629), Shroggs Road (junction with A629)	Suggest that barriers that do not serve a purpose are removed.	A number of barriers will be removed and in some locations, this will create more space for pedestrians.
Ovenden Way/ A629 Ovenden Road junction	Suggest signalising the crossing.	Signalised crossing proposed.
Ovenden Way	Suggest giving cyclists the right of way to allow for continuous crossing.	Where possible we have considered and incorporated pedestrian and cycle priority, including raised crossings, however, in some areas this has not been possible.
Ovenden Way (junction with A629)	Concern about setting the cycle junction apart from the pedestrian crossing, and so close to the T-junction.	Junction proposal has been revised to address this concern.
Ovenden Way	Concerns about the double yellow lines and loss of parking at the bottom of Ovenden Way, which could lead to parking on the planted central reservation and in the layby.	We are aware of this existing issue and are reviewing whether additional parking is feasible. We may also introduce a low fence along the central verge to be introduced to prevent parking mis-use.
Ovenden Way, Ovenden Road and Lee Bridge	Concern about reducing to one lane onto Ovenden Road from Shroggs Road.	The two-lane approach will be retained.
Dean Clough	Suggest reducing the speed to 20mph for all vehicles.	The proposed 20mph speed limit and associated traffic calming / treatment is still included.
Dean Clough	Concern over the timescales of build works and road closures causing disruption to businesses for customers and staff.	Proposals have been simplified where possible to reduce the work required, however, due to the nature of the proposals there will inevitably be a level of disruption. During this time, businesses will be kept informed of progress during construction and will be able to discuss any concerns with the team.
Dean Clough	Objections to Bus Gate.	Removed from proposals in response to consultation feedback, particularly concerns raised by Dean Clough.
Crib Lane	Suggest improvements to lighting, shrubbery and planters, and avoid attracting anti-social behaviour and graffiti.	Access to be maintained.
Crib Lane	Suggest improvements to lighting, shrubbery and planters, and avoid attracting anti-social behaviour and graffiti.	Improvements are proposed.
Akroyd Place	Concern that the bottom end is not a nice area to spend time in.	The proposed design incorporates improvements on Akroyd Place around the underpass.
Akroyd Place	Suggest that enhanced lighting on the dark sections is needed.	Street lighting upgrades proposed.

In addition to updating proposals, and responding to comments made in the 2021/22 consultation, the 2023 engagement period also sought feedback related to outstanding issues on specific design elements, where stakeholder input was useful in helping to update the designs.

Stakeholder engagement in 2023

Engagement aims

The aim of the 2023 engagement period was to support a successful Full Business Case (FBC) submission, which requires the designs for the scheme to be completed to a detailed state and the approvals for necessary changes to the highways layouts and operations to be progressing. To achieve this, the following objectives shaped the engagement activities;

Updating stakeholders on scheme progress, including how the third public consultation (November 2021 to January 2022) has been considered, and where possible, has shaped the proposals. The engagement activity aimed to address the key issues identified during the second public consultation. These were included in a ‘you said, we did’ format in public facing materials, to show where the consultation has impacted the scheme.
Delivering targeted engagement to impacted residents and businesses, giving them the opportunity to inform the development of proposals and understanding concerns to ensure that, where reasonable, these are addressed.
Inform the development of the Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) and maintain and gain support for the scheme by responding to previous consultation feedback and communicating the benefits. To achieve this, the engagement activity focused on discussion and encouraging feedback, promoting the benefits of the scheme and addressing the impacts.

Engagement approach

As this engagement period was aimed at sharing information with a more targeted pool of stakeholders, part of the engagement activity included meetings held with certain selected groups, as well as some public events, and some targeted community events for those who CMBC felt would benefit from seeing the updated proposals. Engagement at this stage allowed stakeholders time to understand the new proposals and give them the opportunity to provide feedback to the project team.

Summary of engagement activity
Activity	Stakeholder	Date	Description of activity
Active travel groups meeting	WYCA active travel	12 January 2023	A meeting with WYCA’s active travel lead to discuss the updated proposals and how they will help to promote active travel methods.
Landowner meeting	Yorkshire Ambulance	2 February 2023	A meeting to discuss potential need for, and feasibility of, land purchase at Ackroyd Place.
Bus operations meeting	WYCA Transport services team	6 February 2023	A meeting with the WYCA Transport Services team to understand the implications of the scheme to the bus services running in Halifax.
CMBC internal meeting	CMBC Asset Management	8 February 2023	A meeting with CMBC Assets Manager to explain the proposals and what support might be needed from them in the future.
Councillor meetings	Cllr Joseph Thompson Cllr Tim Swift Cllr Daniella Durrans Cllr Helen Rivron Cllr Stuart Cairney	14 February 2023 2 March 2023 20 March 2023 20 March 2023 20 March 2023	A presentation delivered to local councillors to show them the updated proposals and encourage them to support the promotion of the public engagement events.
Accessibility meeting	The Accessible Calderdale Disability Access Forum (ACDAF)	6 March 2023	A meeting to discuss the updated proposals and gather feedback on the scheme’s accessibility.
Business owners meeting	Dean Clough stakeholders	7 March 2023	A meeting to discuss the proposals near Dean Clough and discuss which access option they preferred.
Ovenden Ward Forum	General public	15 March 2023	Project team members attended the Ovenden Ward Forum meeting, an open meeting for anyone to attend, to present the scheme and answer any questions.
Community Information Event	Members of the public	28 March 2023	A public event that allowed the community the opportunity to review the updated proposals, share updates to the designs made in response to feedback and encourage feedback on updated proposals. At this event there were leaflets available to take away, with scheme details of the individual corridors of the scheme. Further details of this event can be found below this table.
Active travel groups meeting	Members of the local cycle forum	30 March 2023	A meeting to discuss the plans in the area and ask for feedback as to how cyclists feel the proposals will impact on their cycling journeys.
CMBC internal meeting	CMBC Highways	10 April 2023	A meeting with CMBC Highways team to explain the proposals, discuss the implications on the roads around Halifax, and what support might be needed from them in the future.
Accessibility meeting	Visually impaired independent travellers who utilise public transport in the area	26 April 2023	A meeting to discuss the updated proposals and gather feedback on the scheme’s accessibility for visually impaired individuals.
Bus Operator Engagement	Bus operators with routes in the area	May 2023	Emails updating bus operators on the proposals, and offering a meeting to discuss in more detail, as well as offering a trial of the proposals.
Business outreach activities	Local businesses on Akroyd Place	May 2023	Business outreach comprised of letters, emails and calls to provide stakeholders the opportunity to review the updated proposals, promote the ‘you said, we did’ response to the previous consultation and encourage feedback on updated proposals.

The community information event was held at;

The Forrest Cottage Centre, 28 March 2023, 3 - 7pm.

The event materials included the plans of the scheme, drawings detailing parking loss and gain around the area, as well as the impact on trees.
Project team members were in attendance to talk attendees through the scheme drawings and answer any questions, and feedback forms were available for people to leave their comments. Leaflets were provided to be taken away, with details about each area of the scheme proposals.
This event kept an attendance record and recorded 63 attendees across the four-hour period. The location split of the attendees is shown by postcode below:

Location split of attendees by postcode
Post code	Number of attendees
HX2	45
HX3	14
HX6	3
Prefer not to answer	1

Engagement promotion

While this engagement was more targeted at the people affected by the proposed designs, such as those who live and work close to the scheme area or those who had previously expressed interest in the scheme, there were opportunities for the wider public to understand the proposals. The table below details the different methods involved in contacting various stakeholders;

Promotional methods
Channel	Description
Calderdale Next Chapter webpage	CMBC published updated scheme details on the Calderdale Next Chapter webpage for the project, and promotional materials directed people to this site to find out further details.
WYCA Your Voice webpage	CMBC posted an overview of the scheme so far on the Your Voice webpage: North Halifax Improved Streets for People \| Your Voice (westyorks-ca.gov.uk), which directed people towards the Calderdale Next Chapter page where the latest updates could be found.
Letter drops	In areas of targeted engagement, CMBC conducted letter drops with details about the specific scheme areas and how they could ask questions or provide feedback. Letters were sent to residents of Cousin Lane and Ovenden Way, detailing the proposals in their areas and information on the drop in events.
Emails	CMBC sent emails to local community stakeholders, businesses, and residents, including those who had previously registered an interest in the scheme.
Social media	Details of the public information event were promoted by CMBC on their twitter feed, with details of the event and links to scheme information.
Press releases	A press release was issued by Calderdale Council on 20 March 2023, which included an overview of the scheme as well as information about the public events.
Calderdale Next Chapter newsletter	The Calderdale Next Chapter newsletter was also used to promote the public information events, which is received by around 3,000 people.

Feedback

Feedback was received through a variety of channels:

Stakeholders were encouraged to provide feedback via email or when attending the briefing meetings about the updated proposals.
All interested residents were encouraged to email thenextchapter@calderdale.gov.uk or provide feedback via a Microsoft Forms link.
People who attended the in-person community information event were able to provide both written and verbal feedback to the project team, to ensure views were captured.

Summary of feedback

Summary of feedback received during meetings with stakeholders
Stakeholder	Engagement Topic	Summary of Outcomes
Accessible Calderdale Disability Access Forum	Scheme accessibility	Overall supportive of scheme. Concern visually impaired people might be vulnerable in certain areas across the scheme but pleased that specific engagement with visually impaired people was taking place to understand this further. Mentioned the need for enforcement of plans, such as yellow lines near crossings to prevent parking.
CMBC Asset Manager	Maintenance considerations of schemes	Generally supportive but concerns raised about proposal to reduce carriageway width to 6m on A629 and impact on resilience during routine maintenance. This has now been addressed with a revised road width of 6.5m to allow the adjacent footway to be widened.
CMBC Highways	North Halifax Scheme Overview	Generally accepted the design but raised the need for behaviour change needed to complement the scheme.
Cycle Forum Members	Cycle lane plans, with general overview of the project	Generally positive about the changes and supported the scheme, felt many of the changes would make it safer for cyclists. Concerns about the parking loss/ tree removal and the opposition that it is attracting but think this will make cycling in the area easier.
Dean Clough Stakeholders	Dean Clough design proposals	Support for the proposed materials for the area to ensure the scheme is in keeping with the character of the area. Feedback on their preferred option for the area has helped shape the designs.
Local business owner	Akroyd Place Proposals	Doesn't agree with need for scheme, particular concern over formalisation of parking spaces near their business.
Ovenden Ward forum attendees	North Halifax scheme proposals	This was an open Forum that anyone could attend. Some members of the public that attended disagreed with the need for the scheme, unsure the cycle lane on Cousin Lane is necessary.
Visually Impaired Independent Travellers	North Halifax Scheme overview	Generally supportive and pleased their suggestions were being considered in the designs. Noted a couple of places where extra dropped kerbs or signage would make it more accessible. Lighting was highlighted as key to accessibility for many and wanted to ensure this was incorporated into the designs.
Ward Councillors	Town Ward Councillor Update	Supported the scheme’s approach to safety, for example the slowing of vehicles and better lighting.
Ward Councillors	Ovenden Ward Councillors	Generally supportive of scheme, but felt it was crucial to ensure the views of the community were captured. Some concern over the ability of the scheme to be delivered to a high standard of quality to provide the desired outcome. Overall supported the scheme and were generally keen to aid at engagement events where they could. Pleased that accessibility was being considered in the scheme plans. It should be noted that following residents’ feedback, the councillors withdrew their support for the scheme.
Ward Councillors	Town Ward / Leader Councillor Update	Generally positive, some concerns over crossing placement on Lee Bridge, which have been considered.
Yorkshire Ambulance	Purchase of land at Ackroyd Place	Generally accepted the design, and happy to negotiate the purchase of the land.

Feedback was also collected at the public information events. Below are details of the area specific concerns raised at the public information events;

There was a lot of opposition to the proposals for Cousin Lane. A major concern raised was around the loss of parking, as there was a worry that all parking was being removed in the area. Points were raised around other facilities in the area (such as the church and the Forest Cottage Playing Fields) and how they may attract people to the area to park for short periods, and whether they have been considered.
Some comments suggested that there was a dislike for speed cushions, and they would prefer an alternative traffic calming measure on Cousin Lane.
Some feedback about the cycle lanes on Cousin Lane suggested that the layout would make more sense if the cycle lane was on the opposite side of the road, and it was raised that people may just park on the cycle lane in the current scheme plans.
There was generally support for the improvement of the snickets, although residents wanted confirmation that they would be well lit and signposted, and that there will be maintenance of the areas.
Feedback from Club Lane residents suggested that the potential for parking overspill from Cousin Lane needs to be considered.
An issue was raised around the removal of the mini roundabout, as this may affect visibility when navigating round the area.
Concern was raised around the parking generated by events at the church, and whether the plans had accommodated for this.
Residents were generally supportive of Ovenden Way plans, with people suggesting the proposals would make the area safer.

Some more general comments were raised about the scheme, details of which are below;

There was concern over the loss of trees in the area for both aesthetic and environmental reasons.
Points were raised around the need for appropriate maintenance in the area, as the falling leaves and debris have been found to pose a risk here.
Support was noted in relation to footway resurfacing, as residents felt this would make walking in the area safer.
Cyclists were in support of the scheme and suggested that they felt it would encourage less confident cyclists to choose active modes of transport. It was felt that the routes mirrored the routes they took, and the scheme would make travelling by bike here safer. It was raised that the crossing points felt a bit ‘fiddly’ for a more confident cyclist.
Multiple comments were raised around the need for bins in the area.

Our response to feedback

All issues raised were considered by the design team and have been responded to in the table below. The comments below have come from feedback received both from the in-person engagement activities, from emails and other online communications we have received.

Comments from engagement
Scheme area	Issues	Comment received	Designer’s response
Area wide	Speeding - suggestion	Full width speed bumps with a high gradient along Cousin Lane, Ovenden Way, Nursery Lane and Moorlands Crescent would prevent dangerous speeds and have such a positive impact on traffic calming.	Current guidance is being followed for the type and use of the road by various vehicle types.
Club Lane	Club Lane junction	One respondent questioned why the junction of Club Lane was set back and why it wasn’t up to the Cousin Lane junction like the others	The junction has been set back to incorporate the additional crossing due to the existing footway layout.
	Littering	Suggestion that bins are badly needed.	A review of the existing refuse bin provision will be undertaken and discussed with CMBC Waste Management Team to agree appropriate locations and identify potential budgets.
	Mini roundabouts	Worried about the removal of the mini roundabout - concern that when exiting the give way at Cousin Lane motorists will have to park across the cycle lane to be able to see both ways.	There is sufficient visibility provided to enable motorists to determine whether the cycleway and road are clear to proceed in advance of the cycleway.
	One-way enforcement	The one-way stretch on Club Lane is ignored - could CMBC camera this?	CMBC does not yet have the correct powers for this particular type of camera- based enforcement. It is however a good point that this type of issue should be better enforced and as those powers are currently being developed it may be possible to implement this improvement in the future.
	Parking – loss	Concern that removing parking along Cousin Lane, will impact parking availability outside their homes on Club Lane.	On-street parking bays have been included within the proposals where possible. Further opportunities to create additional on-street parking will be considered.
	Visibility	Worries about visibility coming out of Club Lane onto Cousin Lane.	There is sufficient visibility provided to enable motorists to determine whether the cycleway and road are clear to proceed in advance of the cycleway.
Cousin Lane	Alternative spending	The paths running along Cousin Lane are at times very unsafe due to the leaves, attending to this should take priority for the safety of walkers including children along the paths.	Comment has been passed onto Calderdale Council Highways Maintenance Department.
	Anti-Social Behaviour	Some anti-social behaviour was mentioned, specifically young men speeding on scooters.	Enforcement of these types of anti-social driving behaviours is a police matter. However, the scheme will see the introduction of traffic calming measures in a range of locations which will slow down speeds.
	Business impact	How have the council evaluated the impact for local businesses and what compensation will be offered to them for loss of custom and revenue?	The designs have been developed considering the impact on all potentially affected parties. We have taken legal advice in relation to this query and no compensation provisions would apply in respect of the changes to parking arrangements within the scheme, even if it could be shown that there was an impact.
	Construction	Some residents raised concerns with regards to the level of disruption the build would cause.	Construction works will be undertaken in phases during agreed working hours / days to minimise disruption to the residents. Access to properties will be maintained at all times.
	Cycle lane - location	The cycle lane is on the wrong side of the road, it seems more logical to move it to the other side where it is quiet and no- parks. If left in this location everyone would just park in it.	Assuming that the comment is in reference to the cycle route on the Cousin Lane service road, then this is agreed. The cycle symbol road marking is to be placed on the western side of the service road (outside properties 114 to 166 Cousin Lane).
	Cycle lane - misuse	Concerned that cars would just park in the cycle lane and that motorbikes and quad bikes would use it as they are currently causing issues, especially in the evenings.	Enforcement will need to be undertaken to prevent parking in the cycleway and anti-social use of the cycleways.
	Cycle lanes - alternative	The best route that would be quieter for cyclists would be the section of Cousin Lane that is separate from the main road on the Eastern side.	Service roads at the northern end of Cousin Lane are utilised on both sides of the carriageway. It would be impractical for the eastern service road only to be used for both southbound and northbound cycle routes as it would be difficult to maintain the continuity of the route.
	Cycle lanes - alternative suggestion	Suggested that Cousin Lane cycle lane could be moved behind the wall.	It is not possible to locate the cycle lane directly behind the wall due to the existing ground levels, however, it is proposed to use the service road located on the eastern side of Cousin Lane which provides a quieter section away from the main carriageway.
	Cycle lanes - alternative suggestion	A cycle lane of sorts - can be painted along the width of the path running along Cousin Lane adjacent to Deanfield School and on towards the end of Cousin Lane. This would not cause any long-term disruption and encourage children tosafely cycle to school along the path. This also would not impact anyone other than the path users and the paths would be clearly marked out in a safe logical way.	Unfortunately, the existing footway is too narrow to provide a shared use footway / cycleway or painted cycle lane and this approach would not align with the current design guidance or scheme objectives, therefore it is proposed to introduce a northbound cycle lane adjacent to the footway along Dean Field school and formalised crossing points to allow cyclists to safely cross Cousins Lane from the southbound cycleway if required. This will provide separation between pedestrians and cyclists in line with current design guidance and funding requirements.
	Cycle lanes - alternative suggestion	One respondent suggested that from Bank Edge Road, on the east side and onward toward Morrisons it would appear to be much safer to put the cycle track alongside the pavement, which is already there. There would only be a need to widen the path into the grassed area then following the junction, which already has to be crossed, where there is a pathway on the left next to a grassed area which could be widened.	Widening the existing footway to provide the cycleway adjacent to the footway would require the removal of additional trees and relocation of the existing street lighting columns. It would also not be feasible to widen the path as the driveways are very steep in this area and likely to cause access issues with cars 'grounding out' as levels would not tie into existing ones on the grounds of the property.
	Cycle lanes - Demand	Cycle lanes are not appropriate here because the area is too steep.	Cousin Lane is a relatively flat section of the proposed cycle way, which includes Dean Field Primary School. Off-carriageway cycleways provide a safer alternative to potential cyclists than on- carriageway, particularly where there may be significant uphill gradients.
	Cycle lanes - demand	Request for numbers of cyclists currently using Cousin Lane.	The current levels of cycling on Cousin Lane are very low (less than 10 cyclists were observed over a 12-hour period in January 2023), indicating how unattractive it is for cyclists although it provides direct access to homes and shops. The North Halifax proposals will address this by creating safe, dedicated cycling facilities on Cousin Lane to encourage those that currently choose not to cycle because of traffic conditions.
	Cycle lanes - misuse	Worried that the enforcement of the new infrastructure not being used by motorbikes will not be sufficiently policed.	This is a police matter and is not for the Council to enforce.
	Cycle lanes - Misuse	Expectation that a cycle lane will not be enforceable due to existing dangerous driving in the area, including quad bike usage.	This is a police matter and is not for the Council to enforce.
	Cycle lanes - negative impact	Cycle lanes will stop care home residents and staff parking near the property. There are several issues for staff including time spent commuting and equipment transport.	Parking bays have been provided at appropriate locations along Cousin Lane to allow for parking.
	Cycle lanes - safety	Had a concern that short shared use sections would create conflict between cyclists and pedestrians.	The provision of crossing points is being reviewed and rationalised through the detailed design stage. Alternative arrangements are being considered at crossing points to better define priority and remove potential areas of conflict.
	Cycle lanes - safety	Oppose cycle lanes due to potential conflict with cyclists and pedestrians.	Segregated cycleways are being proposed wherever possible to remove potential conflict between cyclists and pedestrians.
	Engagement and consultation	Stated that they had not received letters with regard to the consultation event.	Letters were sent to residents that were directly impacted by the scheme. This included all residents on Cousin Lane.
	Flooding	A resident raised a flooding issue with surface water and mud regularly causing problems at the bottom of the path next to the children’s care facility.	This was raised with Yorkshire Water who are aware of the issue and are investigating a potential water main leak.
	Grass verge	The grass verge at the end of Sandown Ave is always being churned up by reversing bin lorries and other vehicles. Residents are not happy with the verge being cut back to make a parking area even though they didn’t want to lose parking for visitors.	The turning circle required for the refuse vehicle will be considered during the detailed design phase to remove potential for verge being destroyed.
	Grass verges	Loss of grass verges is opposed. They currently provide a good safety barrier for pedestrians.	Where possible grass verges are being retained, or hard landscaped separation strips provided.
	Littering	Concerned that there are no bins at all on Cousin Lane & especially near to Morrisons. Residents have dogs and find they are picking up litter, especially glass, which is dangerous for the dogs.	A review of the existing refuse bin provision will be undertaken and discussed with CMBC Waste Management Team to agree appropriate locations and identify potential budgets.
	Maintenance	The built-out parking bay traps dirt that the council don’t clear. As there is a bollard here the sweeper misses the corner, and it is always full of leaves and debris. Might be better to remove the bollard.	It is proposed to remove bollards at this location.
	Parking - allocation	Pleased that Council have listened to previous concern about loss of parking here but worries the 8 spaces won’t be enough - could these be resident-only for the homes on her block as the parking will remain across from her? Spoke about the children’s home at 91 Cousin Lane – if they can make parking in their own grounds as part of their refurbishment then she would be happier with the 8 proposed extra spaces as sometimes the children’s home can attract 4-6 cars at a time belonging to staff.	We are currently investigating the possibility of increasing the parking bays outside No 99 from 3 bays to 5 bays. Whilst this is likely to result in the loss of a tree not previously marked for removal it should be noted that the numbers of trees being removed has been dramatically reduced overall since the last engagement. We are also liaising with the Childrens Home regarding the possibility of creating parking within the grounds.
	Parking - allocation	Very concerned about the loss of parking, resident has a drive for one car but doesn’t want to extend this. Where will visitors park? Would a resident parking scheme work?	We are currently reviewing sections of Cousin Lane to identify options to retain or provide parking provision whilst meeting the objectives of the scheme. Due to the nature of the proposals, it is likely there will be some reduction in on- street parking provision, however we are seeking to maximise parking where practical and achievable. Unfortunately, due to limited space on many UK roads it is not always possible to accommodate enough parking on-street for houses with multiple vehicles that cannot be parked within the property.
	Parking - alternative suggestion	Question around what was happening with the land where the old Dean Field School was (adjacent to the new school). Could this be a car park, especially with Forest Cottage having most of their car park turned into housing?	We understand that the Forest Cottage development will not impact the current parking provision as the new housing is to be located within the grassed area only. Provision of addition off- street parking in the fields to the south of Dean Field has been investigated. However, due to land ownership issues this will not be feasible.
	Parking - alternative suggestion	Suggested that there might be ways that the cycle route could be instead installed on the opposite (east) side of Cousin Lane.	While this option is potentially feasible, the differences in road surface level mean a bidirectional (two way) route wouldn’t work in this area. Additionally, the option proposed of a uni-directional (one way) route along Cousin Lane provides continuity of route and is therefore the preferred approach.
	Parking - disabled	Question whether disabled parking permits will still be able to be applied for if the cycle lane is in place.	Unfortunately, disabled (blue badge) parking permits do not allow holders to park within the extent of formal cycle lanes. However, on-street parking provision is to be provided where possible in addition to the general rules applicable to blue badge holders, such as the ability to park on double yellow lines for a limited time where it is safe to do so.
	Parking - existing issues	Resident showed photos of how bad the parking is here at weekends and when events are on at Forest Cottage, the photos showed double parking with buses and cars stuck in the bottleneck.	We are currently reviewing the scheme to identify options to retain or provide parking provision whilst meeting the objectives of the scheme. Due to the nature of the proposals, it is likely there will be some reduction in on street parking provision, however we are seeking to maximise parking where practical and achievable. Unfortunately, high levels of parking occur at numerous sporting facilities/grounds across the country and can often be difficult to manage. Whilst the Council can impose certain traffic / parking management conditions for certain events, it is not always possible or feasible to do so for every event / use. Those with concerns can contact the police if dangerous or obstructive parking occurs as they have powers of enforcement, although due to limited resources this may not be prioritised. Provision of addition off- street parking in the fields to the south of Dean Field has been investigated. However, due to land ownership issues this will not be feasible.
	Parking - existing issues	Pavement parking is causing an issue with residents on Cousin Lane.	Parking on the footway can be dealt with as a council matter if the pavement sits by a carriageway with yellow lining. Unfortunately, the enforcement of all other parking violations and obstruction of the footway can only be carried out by the Police who generally have limited resource to deal with such issues unless it is causing a danger to road safety. Whilst parking restrictions are often suggested to tackle the issue, it will likely result in loss of on-street parking. In cases of dangerous parking, we would recommend contacting the police where there are no lining restrictions via www.westyorkshire.police.uk/report-it/report-nuisance- obstructive-parking. For locations where there are lining restrictions, please email parking@calderdale.gov.uk. Please ensure you provide specific details including, what the problem is, location (road name and town) and the day & time this occurs.
	Parking - impact	Very concerned and not happy about the speed cushion being moved directly outside their house, resident doesn’t have a drive and parks on the road but would have to drive over the speed cushion at an angle, this will cause problems.	The location of the cushion will be reviewed during the detailed design stage.
	Parking - loss	Concern about parking as on the plans of ‘homes with off-street parking’ some may have a drive for 1 car but may have 3-4 cars. This has not been taken into account.	We are currently reviewing options to retain or provide parking provision whilst meeting the objectives of the scheme. Due to the nature of the proposals, it is likely there will be some reduction in on- street parking provision, however we are seeking to maximise parking where practical and achievable. Unfortunately, due to limited space on many UK roads it is not always possible to accommodate enough parking on street for houses with multiple vehicles that cannot be parked within the property.
	Parking - loss	Concerned about the scheme due to loss of on- street parking and the poor sight lines they have getting in and out of their driveway.	There will be no reduction in visibility for vehicles emerging from private driveways.
	Parking - loss	Concerned about the loss of parking – as properties with driveways that are shared, they were concerned about having the space to get all their vehicles in.	A proposal is currently being considered that may provide some additional on-street parking to the south of Moorlands Avenue. Due to the nature of the proposals, it is likely that there will be some reduction in on street parking provision, however we are seeking to maximise parking where practical and achievable. Unfortunately, due to limited space on many UK roads it is not always possible to accommodate enough parking on street for houses with multiple vehicles that cannot be parked within the property.
	Parking - loss	Resident raised the issue of the misconception about off-street parking. Lots of residents have shared driveways so are unable to use these to park their cars because they would block in their neighbours.	A proposal is currently being considered that may provide some additional on-street parking to the south of Moorlands Avenue. Due to the nature of the proposals, it is likely that there will be some reduction in on-street parking provision, however we are seeking to maximise parking where practical and achievable. Unfortunately, due to limited space on many UK roads it is not always possible to accommodate enough parking on street for houses with multiple vehicles that cannot be parked within the property.
	Parking - loss	A number of residents were also concerned about the volumes of parking that the area sees at weekends with the sporting activity that gathers and brings parking demand from use of the pitches at Forest Cottage.	Unfortunately, high levels of parking occur at numerous sporting facilities/grounds across the country and can often be difficult to manage. Whilst the Council can impose certain traffic/ parking management conditions for certain events, it is not always possible or feasible to do so for every event/use. We suggest contacting the police if dangerous or obstructive parking occurs as they have powers of enforcement, although due to limited resources this may not be prioritised.
	Parking - loss	An issue was raised about the 2 bus stops and the loss of parking spaces outside the resident’s houses.	The proposals retain the existing bus stop provision and aims to provide on- street parking in the vicinity of properties with no off- street parking facilities. Due to the nature of the proposals, it is likely that there will be some reduction in on-street parking provision, however we are seeking to maximise parking where practical and achievable. Unfortunately, due to limited space on many UK roads it is not always possible to accommodate enough parking on street for houses with multiple vehicles that cannot be parked within the property.
	Parking - loss	Questioned where residents impacted by the proposed cycle lane will park if they have no driveway.	On-street parking bays have been included within the proposals where possible. Through the detailed design phase, opportunities to create additional on-street parking will be considered.
	Pedestrian crossings	Concerns raised about the elderly and young crossing Cousin Lane and the need for pedestrian crossings and zebra crossings.	The provision of formalised and controlled crossing points is being considered through the detailed design phase.
	Pedestrian route	Respondent wanted to know why we are moving the current pedestrian route, as this is well used where it is. Respondent didn’t think that reducing the footway to 1.5m was wide enough for pedestrians with prams and wheelchairs being restricted by the cycle lane.	The proposals include a general footway width of 2.0m. Where footways are reduced to 1.5m, this is over short sections only which meets the current guidelines for inclusive mobility.
	Road surfacing	Recently when Cousin Lane was resurfaced the bus box wasn’t replaced - can this be replaced as part of the plans?	It is proposed to reline the carriageway along the route as part of the proposals. As part of this work, the bus stop lining will be replaced.
	Safety - Road layout and crossing location	Resident suggested that the northern end of his road should be stopped up to provide a place for the crossing to be located as the existing location is too close to the Turner Place junction, and he thought that the existing proposal is in a dangerous location.	The crossing has been placed on the desired line to provide connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists through Turner Place and the wider area. Adequate visibility is to be provided for vehicles entering Cousin Lane from Turner Place.
	Safety - street lighting	Resident felt there was a need for more street lighting.	A street lighting assessment will be undertaken following discussions with Calderdale Lighting team to ensure lighting meets required standards.
	Speed cushions	One respondent liked the proposals but didn’t like speed cushions. Could we use something else or install speed cameras?	Speed cushions provide effective speed reduction measures when installed in accordance with latest guidance and are recommended on designated bus routes over full width or flat-topped humps. Speed limit enforcement is a matter for the police and there are currently no proposals to include speed cameras.
	Speeding - camera enforcement	Some concerns raised about the lack of traffic enforcement on Cousin Lane, even though there’s a 20mph speed limit, vehicles are still speeding. It was suggested that speed cameras could help to reduce the speed.	There is a strict West Yorkshire criteria for the installation of speed cameras relating to the severity of speed related collisions within a given period. Even where CMBC officers are not always happy with these criteria, the ability to influence or change them is very limited. As such, Cousin Lane does not qualify for the installation of speed cameras based on the criteria. Speed cushions provide effective speed reduction measures when installed in accordance with latest guidance and are recommended on designated bus routes and preferred over full width or flat-topped humps due to limited impact to bus passengers. Unfortunately, there will always be some anti-social drivers who disregard speed limits and the Council have limited powers to address this other than the use of appropriate traffic calming.
	Speeding - camera enforcement	Cousin Lane needs speed enforcement cameras for the 20mph zone.	There is strict WYCA criteria for the installation of speed cameras relating to the severity of speed related collisions within a given period. Cousin Lane does not qualify for the installation of speed cameras based on the criteria. Speed cushions provide effective speed reduction measures when installed in accordance with latest guidance and are recommended on designated bus routes and preferred over full width or flat-topped humps due to limited impact to bus passengers. Unfortunately, there will always be some anti-social drivers who disregard speed limits and the Council have limited powers to address this other than the use of appropriate traffic calming.
	Tree loss - facilitating development	Respondent was concerned that the trees are being felled not to facilitate improvements but to allow for access to the proposed residential development at Forest Cottage.	Following a review of the design and subsequent site visit, a number of trees that were previously marked for removal can be retained with several others identified for possible retention subject to the use of certain construction techniques. This will be reflected in the detailed design.
	Tree loss - habitats	Concern that the felling will impact birds and bats living in the trees.	A review of the trees to be removed is currently being undertaken and will be minimised as far as possible. Where required ecological surveys will be undertaken to ensure any works to existing trees are carried out in accordance with current guidance and the law. Following a review of the design and subsequent site visit, a number of trees that were previously marked for removal can be retained with several others identified for possible retention subject to the use of certain construction techniques. This will be reflected in the detailed design. A bat roost survey has been undertaken along the whole scheme corridor to identify potential impact to nesting birds and bats. Although options are being considered to maintain as many trees as possible, none of the trees on Cousin Lane that may be lost have been identified as having bat roost suitability
	Trees - loss	Concerned about the number of trees being removed.	Following a review of the design and subsequent site visit, a number of trees that were previously marked for removal can be retained with several others identified for possible retention subject to the use of certain construction techniques. This will be reflected in the detailed design.
	Trees - maintenance	Trees here need cutting back as they are overgrown and hanging into the road, worried that lorries and buses may break the branches.	This concern has been passed onto Highways Maintenance Team for their attention.
	Trees - maintenance	Very concerned with the lack of maintenance of the trees in that area as they drop a large amount of leaf litter. She wasn’t asking for the trees to be removed, and did emphasise that, but didn’t seem unhappy with the suggestion that a couple in that area were earmarked as such.	Comments to be passed onto Calderdale Council Maintenance Department. A review of the trees to be removed is currently being undertaken and will be minimised as far as possible.
	Trees - removal	One resident would like the tree to go outside their house as they don’t like the leaves it drops on their garden. Would love to see a community garden as part of the plans - perhaps on the site of land below Deanfield School.	Trees will only be removed where required as part of the proposals. There are no proposals to provide a community garden within the scope of these works.
	Trees - replanting	One person wanted to know where the trees scheduled to be cut down, will be replanted, particularly as North Halifax Partnership have invested money in making the area more presentable by planting plants etc. Where will these be replanted within the area - as the area around Cousin Lane is currently looking very nice. How many trees will be replanted?	Where possible trees will be replanted as close as possible to trees being removed. Further opportunities to provide additional trees will also be considered through detailed design. Following a review of the design and subsequent site visit, a number of trees that were previously marked for removal can be retained with several others identified for possible retention subject to the use of certain construction techniques. This will be reflected in the detailed design.
Cousin Lane and Ovenden Way	Cycle lanes - safety	Concerns were raised regarding the visibility from drivers from the houses pulling out onto Ovenden Way and Cousin Lane.	There will be no reduction in visibility for vehicles emerging from private driveways.
Dean Clough	Engagement and consultation	A local sculptor came to have a look and stated that there is an artist community at the mill, who are becoming more community-focused and are keen to be involved.	There is future work planned around how to incorporate an arts and culture element to the scheme, so these comments have been noted.
Moorlands Drive	Engagement and consultation	Moorlands Drive residents were disappointed that they did not receive letters about the information event.	Letters were only sent to residents that were directly impacted by the scheme (Cousin Lane and Ovenden Way). However, the information event was also promoted for other local residents via newsletter, social media, posters and a press release.
Not specific	Alternative spending	Suggest funding for free public transport.	The funding associated with this project can only be spent on capital transport projects such as the building of new physical infrastructure.
	Alternative spending	Suggestions for funding to be spent on fixing roads (potholes), reducing council tax, cleaning roads, footpath and verge improvements and maintenance, planting and landscaping, lighting.	The funding associated with this project can only be spent on capital transport projects such as the building of new physical infrastructure.
	Benefits	Resident stated that there will be no economic benefit for the area.	While it is true that on one individual trip, car drivers tend to spend more than shoppers who have arrived by sustainable transport; cyclists, pedestrians and people arriving by public transport tend to visit more frequently and spend more over the course of a month. This is supported by studies undertaken by Sustrans
	Bus proposals	The proposals do nothing to encourage people to use public transport.	Although this is primarily an active travel project, the bus stops along the corridor will benefit from improved lining, tactile paving surfaces to limit conflict and where possible, raised kerbs to improve access for those with mobility difficulties.
	Bus stops - safety	The bus stops are a potential for an accident. The representative stated that the cycle paths will be diverted on to the buses near side. This is highly dangerous as you will be having cyclists riding into the path of public transport users alighting or climbing on to a bus, an accident waiting to happen.	Separation is provided between pedestrian and cycle areas and tactile crossing points are provided for pedestrians. This arrangement is shown in LTN1/20 'Cycle Infrastructure Design'.
	Business case	Oppose quoted 2000% increase in cycle traffic based on pandemic period. It is a 'return to normality' now. Others asked what figure the 2000% increase would be.	Car-based transport has been identified as a key contributor to emissions and poor air quality in Calderdale. Whilst acknowledged as ambitious, our current Climate Action Plan has an ambition to increase the levels of cycling by 22 times that of current levels to contribute to minimising the impacts of car-based transport. Even much more conservative actual increases in cycling would be sufficient to justify the business case for the scheme.
	Congestion	Concern that the proposals will cause congestion on impacted roads and the neighbouring streets.	The proposals are being supported by detailed traffic modelling to identify the wider impacts. Given the nature of the proposals and that most sections are on the footway, there is no indication of significant congestion in the project area.
	Cycle lanes - Demand	Questioned the proposed volume of cycle users who will use the new cycle lanes - when answering this please consider King Cross cycle lane.	There is a strategic ambition to significantly raise the number of people who wish to cycle in Calderdale. The way that this can be best achieved is through the provision of high quality and continuous cycle infrastructure which is attractive not just to those who already choose to cycle but also those who would wish to do so and currently do not because of concerns around personal safety in unsegregated on- carriageway cycling. The Transforming Cities Fund programme has been developed since more rigorous national guidance and regional quality expectations have been introduced, which should ensure that the final delivered scheme is to a high quality.
	Cycle lanes - Demand	Resident stated that the outcome report shows that zones 1a - 3b have a positive response to walking but not to cycling - so concluded, there is no evidence to suggest residents and businesses want a cycle lane, and requested the evidence that the plans are based upon.	The feedback received from the consultations has shaped the current plans for the North Halifax Improved Streets for People scheme. Responses to the 2021-2022 consultation suggest that respondents support active travel improvements, and that these will encourage people to walk and cycle more.
	Cycle lanes - demand	The area is one of the most deprived in Calderdale so finding the extra funds from already overstretched budgets for bikes is going to be impossible.	The funding for this project has come from a central government pot specifically allocated for transport capital schemes. This has no impact on existing Council funding.
	Cycle lanes - demand	Question what studies have taken place and how many surveys undertaken to assess cycle usage on Ovenden way, Lee Bridge and Cousin Lane.	Traffic data (parking, pedestrian, cyclists, traffic and speeds) has been collected within the project area to understand the current demand and help inform the design of the proposals. This baseline data also helps to ensure appropriate schemes are being suggested where they needed.
	Cycle lanes - maintenance	Worried about the cycle lane and how it would look in the future, they felt that if wasn’t maintained it would look really bad and could be dangerous.	Long term maintenance arrangements are important. Calderdale officers are talking internally to make sure that the right measures are in place.
	Cycle lanes - safety	As walkers they were really concerned about the shared use sections as they felt that these are very dangerous. Why can’t the improvements be for pedestrians, this would get more people walking? Cyclists should stick to the road.	The provision of crossing points is being reviewed and rationalised through the detailed design stage. Alternative arrangements are being considered at crossing points to better define priority and remove potential areas of conflict.
	Cycle lanes - safety	Respondent suggests the cycle lanes will be slightly raised. This is a potential hazard and could cause an accident by a cyclist to slip off or a car clipping the raised section, damaging a tyre or steering.	There is no significant risk of cyclists 'slipping off' the cycleway into the carriageway. A 1.5m wide one-way cycleway provides ample width for cyclists to cycle away from the edge of the carriageway. The kerb upstand between the cycleway and the carriageway poses no greater danger for a car than normal kerbing at the edge of the carriageway.
	Cycle lanes - safety	The cycle lane directs to the near side of buses when stopped, which could cause an accident.	The scheme has been designed in accordance with LTN 1/20 ' Cycle Infrastructure Design'
	Cycle lanes - safety	Concern about safety of road junctions, especially the one at Dean Field School.	Junctions have been designed in accordance with latest guidance (LTN 1/20) and formalises the current guidance in the highway code - vehicles turning into side roads should give way to pedestrians and cyclists.
	Cycle lanes - safety	Concern that these would not be enforceable and would be misused by anti- social and speeding drivers (of cars and quad bikes).	This is a police matter and is not for the Council to enforce.
	Cycle lanes - schools	Two issues regarding children not using the cycle lanes because of the weather and whether there has been any engagement with schools about safe parking for cycles, so they are not stolen.	Work has been undertaken with both St Malachys and Deanfield Schools to encourage cycle/scooter usage including the provision of storage and schemes (such as the WOW badge scheme) to encourage active travel to school. These schemes will continue in the future to ensure active travel is promoted.
	Cycle lanes - unnecessary	Resident had nothing against the improvements but stated that the cycle lanes are unnecessary. He stated that those who work are too far from work to cycle and that public transport journeys will be longer.	Cycle lanes are provided primarily for local journeys and aim to encourage active means of travel. They may provide an opportunity for residents to travel in a non- motorised way to the amenities in the town centre.
	Cycling - existing issues	Existing safety issue with unmarked speed bumps and potholes make cycling dangerous.	All speed humps along the route are to be renewed and / or relocated as part of the works, including the refreshing of triangle road markings to improve visibility of humps. Repair and resurfacing works will also be carried out as necessary.
	Cycling funding	Due to Halifax terrain, serious consideration needs to be given to a scheme to allow people with less available income to purchase e-bikes.	The project team are working with other departments at the council to consider ways that access to e-bikes (e.g. via temporary loan of bikes) might be considered.
	Engagement and consultation	Consultation felt like a tick box event.	Although covid restricted face to face engagement, the scheme has previously been through two rounds of consultation in early 2021 and late 2021/early 22 using a dedicated online webpage. There was also a pre-scheme engagement around people’s general thoughts and aspirations for their streets taken in 2019. The aim of engagement work undertaken in 2023 was not to consult on proposals but to share updated proposals with the local community, demonstrate how we had responded to feedback received from the two previous consultations and share scheme progress. That said, the project team are taking on board comments from stakeholders and making amends where possible and feasible.
	Engagement and consultation	Concerns were raised about the lack of previous consultation and the lack of publicity for the previous consultations.	Although covid restricted face to face engagement, the scheme has previously been through two rounds of consultation in early 2021 and late 2021/early 22 using a dedicated online webpage. There was also a pre-scheme engagement around people’s general thoughts and aspirations for their streets taken in 2019. The aim of engagement work undertaken in 2023 was not to consult on proposals but to share updated proposals with the local community, demonstrate how we had responded to feedback received from the two previous consultations and share scheme progress. That said, the project team are taking on board comments from stakeholders and making amends where possible and feasible.
	Engagement and consultation	Having only received 148 online survey responses back, how has the consultation process deemed to be valid.	Various channels were used to ensure the engagement was as far-reaching and accessible to all as possible. This included publicising the plans on a dedicated webpage as well as in-person events and email correspondence. We have also recently engaged with specific user groups (visually impaired, disability groups) remotely and in-person to ensure their views are captured and reflected in the development of the designs.
	Engagement and consultation	When the survey was drawn up, why were the following linked and not marked as separate entities: Cycling and Walking and Cycling and Bus.	Because this project aims to make walking, cycling and bus travel easier and safer and improve access between North Halifax and Halifax town centre, the three sustainable travel modes have been incorporated into the same category. This helped us to understand people’s perceptions on whether the overall proposals would achieve the goals of the project.
	Engagement and consultation	Request for 2020 consultation survey responses, specifically what areas people were from and what groups were engaged.	These details can be found at North Halifax Improved Streets for People \| Your Voice (westyorks-ca.gov.uk).
	Parking - disabled	Question whether blue badge holders will be able to park outside homes.	Unfortunately, disabled (blue badge) parking permits do not allow holders to park within the extent of formal cycle lanes. However, on-street parking provision is to be provided where possible in addition to the general rules applicable to blue badge holders, such as the ability to park on double yellow lines for a limited time where it is safe to do so.
	Parking - loss	Moving cars away from homes will lead to crime and vandalism.	We are currently investigating options to maximise and retain as much on-street parking as possible as part of the designs. There is no evidence that locating parking bays away from outside residential properties increases crime or vandalism.
	Parking - loss	Proposals will have a negative impact on house prices because there is no parking outside houses.	There is nothing to suggest this scheme will decrease property values, therefore there is no compensation available for this scheme. The Council suggests seeking legal advice if you have further concerns.
	Safety - buses	Concern raised that no risk assessment of people exiting buses or shared pavements has been carried out. They stated that elderly people will now have to look for cars and cyclists.	The provision of crossing points is being reviewed and rationalised through the detailed design stage. Alternative arrangements are being considered at crossing points to better define priority and remove potential areas of conflict.
	Scheme benefits	Respondent asked how the proposals promote 'economic inclusivity'.	North Halifax is one of the areas in the borough where dependence on public transport is at its highest. As such the scheme provides people without car access with a greater range of travel options. Also, health outcomes are some of the worst in the borough in north Halifax and those with poor health are less likely to be economically active. As such, providing for health promoting travel choices does have a positive relationship to promoting economic inclusivity.
	Scheme context	Why North Halifax, specifically, was chosen for this project and what other areas were looked at?	Access to a car is at one of the lowest levels in Calderdale in the north Halifax area and public transport dependence is at its highest. Levels of active travel are also some of the lowest in the whole of the borough despite relatively close proximity to the main employment destination in Halifax town centre. Therefore, providing for improved active travel access provides those with limited transport options with more choice and opportunity at the same time as promoting improved health through active travel.
	Scheme context	Why has the scheme at Shay Lane and beyond the Morrisons supermarket been scrapped?	In the previous stage of the development of the business case it was found that the cost estimations for scheme delivery were higher than an earlier estimation. It was therefore necessary that 'value engineering' would be required. Because the scheme on Shay Lane and further into Illingworth were of a more local nature, offering no direct connections to Halifax town centre as the main employment destination, it was deemed most logical that the continuous route of the scheme from Cousin Lane through to the town centre via Dean Clough, the A629 and Ovenden Way should be prioritised as these stronger links would make for a more robust business case.
	Speed bumps - existing	These are extremely dangerous and are ineffective as a deterrent for speeding.	Latest guidance is being followed for the provision of speed humps to provide the most effective speed reduction measures.
	Traffic	An evaluation of increased traffic due to the narrowing of roads and the impact this would have on diverted route.	Traffic modelling is being undertaken as part of these works. These results are being finalised but there are no indications of significant congestion or traffic diversion as a result of the scheme.
	Trees - loss	Respondents oppose the loss of trees. Some were concerned about impact on air quality and local ecology.	Following a review of the design and subsequent site visit, a number of trees that were previously marked for removal can be retained with several others identified for possible retention subject to the use of certain construction techniques. This will be reflected in the detailed design. Where required ecological surveys will be undertaken to ensure any works to existing trees are carried out in accordance with current guidance and the law.
Nursery Lane	Crossings	Worried that the hearse (and 2 funeral cars) won't be able to park by the front steps on Nursery Lane due to the zig zags following the zebra crossing.	The location of the crossing has been reviewed and can be moved closer to the roundabout to accommodate parking outside the church steps.
	Incorrect materials	Attendee states that there is no grass verge outside Nursery Close, as shown on the drawings.	The drawing shows proposed verge in this location.
	Parking - existing issues	Main events such as weddings and funerals can cause chaos with parking.	The location of the crossing has been reviewed and can be moved closer to the roundabout to accommodate parking outside the church steps. Parking associated with the church will be dispersed within the local area, in areas where parking is permitted.
Ovenden Road	Bus stop - alternative suggestion	Concern from the bus driver about the bus stop in the road at the bottom of Ovenden Road - feels it would be safer in the layby and not having the waiting island for pedestrians.	Current guidance (Buses in Urban Developments, CHIT , January 2018 and Bus Services New Residential Developments & General Highways and Urban Design advice to applicants and Highway Authorities, Stagecoach , 2017) suggest that bus stops are located on carriageway to minimise delays to buses having to pull out into traffic, unless the bus is to be stationary for a significant length of time.
Ovenden Way	Cycle lanes - feasibility	The road is too steep for people to cycle on.	We acknowledge this section of the proposed cycle route is steep, however, as it forms part of the commuting route between the town centre it is expected to attract the use of cyclists. Sufficient lane width will be provided to offer separation from adjacent vehicles and cater for the slower moving uphill cycling movements. On the downhill cycle route, whilst it is possible for cyclists to use the carriageway with other vehicles, the unidirectional route provides separation from vehicular traffic and offers protection for pedestrians against faster moving cycles - the segregated lane will also encourage slower cycle speeds due to the visually narrow lane compared to using the carriageway.
	Cycle lanes - safety	Ovenden Way will be a shared path with cyclists and no consideration or risk assessment has been made to the dangers of cycles travelling more than fifteen miles an hour (Electric bikes can easily do this especially when modified) hitting a pedestrian.	The cycleway through Ovenden Way is to be a segregated cycleway. There will be a level difference with a kerb upstand between the footway and the cycleway.
	Grass verge	Bus driver along Ovenden Way commented that currently people do come out of the side streets and mount the grass to pass a parked bus - knee rails to protect the grass from cars mounting it would be good and promote safety.	Comment noted, to be considered as part of design development where feasible.
	Mini roundabouts	Double roundabout on Ovenden Way – they are too close to each other, and cars are stopping and can be dangerous (at the zebra crossing). Suggestion that the zebra crossing is moved away from the roundabout. The bus stop should be before the zebra crossing so people can cross in front of the bus.	The design of Pedestrian Crossings (LTN 2/95) suggests a minimum setback of 5m for a zebra crossing. Crossings have been provided on the pedestrian desire line and it is not considered appropriate in this instance to locate crossings too far away from desire lines as people will then likely cross informally in the vicinity of the mini roundabout, which is likely to be unsafe. It is good practice to provide crossings to the rear of bus stops as the bus will block visibility for approaching cars if the crossing is located in front of a bus stop. It is also safer to provide a crossing behind a bus stop as the bus driver will be looking over their shoulder when they move away.
	Roundabouts - existing	Existing roundabouts are dangerous, there are accidents that occur here. What are the proposals doing to improve safety?	Collision data has shown only one personal injury collision on the mini roundabouts in the last 5 years. The proposals will improve facilities for pedestrians and cyclists through the area.
Ovenden Way and Cousin Lane	Cycle lanes - safety	Concern that children wouldn't use these cycle lanes because it is still not safe due to volume of traffic.	Segregated cycle ways have been provided in areas of heavy traffic and designed in accordance with LTN 1/20, providing separation from traffic flows. Controlled pedestrian and cycle crossings are to be provided along the route to improve safety at crossing points for all users.
Snickets	Lighting	Lighting is a must on the Forest Avenue/Forest Crescent snicket as this is currently unlit, so people do not use it in winter.	Detailed proposals for the snickets are still in development, however, this will include a review of the current lighting and associated improvements where necessary, along with vegetation clearance / trimming and surface improvements.
	Trees - maintenance	Can we do a really good cutback on the Threeways snicket as the overhanging vegetation really does block out light.	Comments to be passed onto Calderdale Council Maintenance Department to request interim cut-back / maintenance, however, the proposals will include comprehensive vegetation clearance and trimming where required, along with other improvements within the snickets.
	Vehicular access	Concern about people driving into the snickets - currently the snicket by Forest Avenue is grass and very muddy as it is being drove on. Will this be resurfaced, and bollards added to stop vehicles?	Vehicular access is required to a garage located off the north western snicket from Forest Avenue and this will be resurfaced. However, in other areas, measures to prevent vehicles accessing the snickets will be provided.
	Vehicular access	Concern if we remove the barriers in the snickets, we will get motorbikes using them - the barriers were put in by the council to stop motorbikes using them.	The gap at the entrance to the snicket is currently 1.05m wide, whilst a single bollard may not prevent a determined motorcyclist, it should deter most nuisance motorcyclists. Any further restriction on the access width will prevent wheelchair users and pushchairs being able to access.

Additional feedback

Some comments received during the community information event were recorded and reviewed for consideration as part of the development of proposals, however no suggestions were made and the comments did not require a design team response. These are included in the table below:

Additional comments
Scheme area	Topic	Comment received
Cousin Lane	Cycle lanes – support	Supported a scheme run by Forest Cottage last year that gave away bikes to the local community, this was very popular and all the bikes went in a day.
Cousin Lane	General - support	Really supportive of all the proposals and thinks people will like the fact that money is being spent in this area & felt they would respect the new works. Really liked the plans for the snickets especially the lighting, they need bringing back into use & feels they will be well used.
Cousin Lane	Housing development	Concerns about the new housing development that is starting in the car park of Forest Cottage as a new access is now planned onto Cousin Lane. This will cause issues & trees will have to be cut down.
Cousin Lane	Parking	No concerns about the cycle lane as long as he could still park outside his house, as he has 4 cars. Resident doesn’t have a driveway like other residents but was in the process of contacting Together Housing to enquire about doing this.
Cousin Lane	Cycle lane - demand	Resident gets what we are trying to do but mentioned that there aren’t many cyclists now, but they might use it.
Cousin Lane	Cycle lane - usage	They wouldn’t use the cycle lane as they are too old! But didn’t mind it.
Cousin Lane	General	Happy with the scheme and nice to see some money being spent in North Halifax.
Cousin Lane	Mini roundabouts	Support for removing the mini roundabouts - poor driver behaviour means they are dangerous; lots of accidents happen at the Moor Lane roundabout.
Cousin Lane	Mini roundabouts	Recommend retaining mini roundabouts.
Cousin Lane	Parking - demand	Resident stated that there shouldn’t be any concern about lack of parking for residents in the bungalows at the top as they generate very little such demand. Also said that they wouldn’t be bothered about having to access and leave his far northern Cousin Lane service road from the Turner Place side only.
Cousin Lane	Parking - loss	Concerned about parking changes along Cousin Lane - was given the impression online that ALL parking was being removed but now he has come and seen the plans he feels better about the scheme.
Cousin Lane	Pavements	Support for a refresh of the pavements - this is overdue as the tree damage has caused the flags to lift.
Cousin Lane	Raised table - support	Humps that went across the full length of the road would be better as this would prevent drivers dodging the calming.
Cousin Lane	Raised table - support	They thought that increased vertical calming would slow vehicle speeds on the part of Cousin Lane outside their properties.
Ovenden Road	Cycle lanes - support	Cyclist attended the event and commented that he had always thought that Ovenden Road’s pavement should be a cycle lane - it is a perfect width for this.
Ovenden Way	Cycle lane - support	Keen on safe route for cycling in this area as her children would use this to visit their grandma and she would feel comfortable they were safe not cycling on the road with traffic.
Ovenden Way	General - support	Resident doesn’t have a car and travels by bus or on foot. Is supportive of scheme as feels that it would make it easier for her.
Ovenden Way	Parking - loss	Resident concerned about losing parking - pleased once they saw the plans that the parking is to remain where they live and park.
Ovenden Way and Cousin Lane	Cycle lane - support	Cyclist attended and commented that he supported the idea and felt it was needed in the area for the less confident cyclist. As a confident cyclist he perhaps wouldn’t use the ‘fiddly’ crossings, but he would use the main sections into Halifax- this is the route he uses from Cousin Lane to Halifax town centre already.
Snickets	Signage	Support for good signage at the snickets- especially the one around the Rugby’s.

Further feedback

There was a lot of concern from residents about this scheme, and this led to a lot of correspondence being received by local councillors, Members of Parliament, the Mayor of West Yorkshire and West Yorkshire Combined Authority as well as by the project team at Calderdale Council. A petition was started by a group of concerned residents, to express their objection specifically to the cycle lanes on Cousin Lane/ Ovenden Way. This feedback has been noted by the project team and will continue to be considered as the scheme progresses.

Conclusion

A significant amount of feedback was received during the March to May 2023 engagement stage. This was considered by the design team and has been responded to in the ‘feedback’ section above. Although many aspects of the scheme were accepted by stakeholders, it was evident that changes need to be considered for specific areas of the scheme.

Some of the feedback received during this engagement has been addressed and has had the following impact;

Impact of feedback
Area	Impact
Cousin Lane	Consideration being given to segregated cycleway in verge area between Keighley Road junction and Myrtle Drive.
Cousin Lane	Review number of crossing points and rationalise to minimise tree loss.
Cousin Lane	Cycle way on eastern side of carriageway to be incorporated into zebra crossings to remove potential conflict between pedestrian and cyclists.
Cousin Lane	Parking bays north of school access to be amended to parallel parking bays to reduce tree loss.
Cousin Lane	Feasibility of providing additional parking to be reviewed particularly south of Moorlands Avenue and around Club Lane and opposite Forrest Cottage.
Cousin Lane	Cycle marking on eastern service road to be placed on western side of service road.
Nursery Lane	Traffic flows to be reviewed to determine appropriate type of crossing outside Church.
Ovenden Road	Road width through Ovenden Road to be maintained at 6.5m, to provide safety clearance during maintenance works and ensure resilience of the network.
Site wide	Repair and resurfacing works carried out where appropriate.

The changes made have helped to ensure that the scheme is shaped by the people directly impacted. The Full Business Case will incorporate these updated proposals.

Next Steps

Any further updates to the scheme will be communicated on the North Halifax Improved Streets for People page, and via Calderdale Council’s social media channels.

Some further engagement activities will take place, such as ongoing engagement with bus operators, as well as an accessibility audit that will be completed across the scheme.

A Full Business Case will be submitted to WYCA for the scheme in late 2023. If the business case is approved, construction is expected in 2024/25.